What people have told us about NHS administration

Download (PDF 346.2 KB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch England analysed their national datasets to look into the experiences of people with NHS administration. This analysis was carried out as part of a project that was initiated by The King’s Fund in December 2019.

Two sets of data were analysed - data shared by the local Healthwatch with Healthwatch England via the CiviCRM system and via reports between April 2019 and April 2020. The findings shed light on how poor admin affected experiences of care for the following groups of people:

  • Sporadic users of health services - i.e. people who generally interact with NHS services only occasionally. Themes include, issues with GP registration, booking GP appointments, receiving incorrect information, and errors in communication, referrals, and prescriptions.
  • People who are/have been on the musculoskeletal (MSK) and cancer care pathway. Themes include, delays in receiving appointment letters, receiving incorrect letters, misplaced or delayed test results, and inaccurate communication.
  • People who use multiple health services, on a regular basis. Themes include, referral delays, delays in receiving prescriptions including getting incorrect medications, inaccuracies in communication between and with the services and getting conflicting information from different service providers.  
  • The report also highlights how poor admin issues in the NHS impacts specific groups of people such as the elderly, people with language barriers and those who have sight or hearing impairments.   

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch England
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Key themes
Administration (records, letters, results)
Booking appointments
Cancellation
Follow-on treatment and continuity of care
Diagnosis
Written information, guidance and publicity
Medication, prescriptions and dispensing
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Referrals

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
Yes
Name(s) of the partner organisation(s)
The King's Fund and local Healthwatch
Primary research method used
General feedback
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
Pharmacy
General Practice (GP)
General outpatients and hospital-based consultants
Oncology and cancer care
Pain management
Phlebotomy/blood tests
Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) and specialist MH services

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
112
Age group
All
Gender
All
Sexual orientation
Not known
Does this report feature carers?
Yes
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.