User perception of the Personal Independence Coordinator Service

Download (PDF 1.38 MB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Croydon undertook research on users’ experiences of the Personal Independence Coordinator (PIC) service. They received 84 responses from people using the service, representing a 30% response rate from the 279 questionnaires distributed. The survey explored how PICs supported people with long-term conditions, social and emotional needs, and independent living. 

The report found very high levels of satisfaction with the service. All respondents felt their PIC listened to them, 99% said their wishes were considered and 86% reported that their quality of life had improved as a result of working with a PIC. Many respondents said PICs helped them access support, improve confidence, reduce loneliness, find community activities, arrange care and benefits, and feel more informed about available services. People who had more contact with their PIC generally reported greater benefits. 

Most respondents said the service helped them live more independently and three-quarters felt they were able to meet with their PIC as often as they wanted. The most common suggestion for improvement was to provide more visits, more time with clients and additional resources so that more people could benefit from the service. A small number of respondents raised concerns about continuity of support when a PIC left the service and communication about replacement staff. 

Healthwatch Croydon concluded that the PIC service was highly valued by its users and was making a positive difference to people's wellbeing and independence. However, the survey did not find evidence that increasing PIC contact reduced hospital admissions, and it recommended further research and repeat surveys to assess the longer-term impact of the service. 

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Croydon
Publication date
Key themes
Access to services
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Consent, choice, user involvement and being listened to
Integration of services and communication between professionals
Service organisation, delivery, change and closure

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Survey
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
84
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.