Social prescribing: awareness levels in Buckinghamshire

Download (PDF 582.71 KB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Buckinghamshire wanted to find out about awareness of social prescribing across Bucks. They developed a survey which was online from 12 May to 4 July 2022. They also collected responses directly from the public in four libraries (Chesham, Aylesbury, High Wycombe and Buckingham) between 6 and10 June. They also did a short piece of desktop work to look at what local GP surgeries said about social prescribing on their websites.  They heard from 259 people.

Most of the people who completed the survey had not heard of social prescribing. When given a high-level explanation of the service, most thought it was a good idea. However, overall, many remained cautious because of a lack of knowledge.

Over a quarter of the 259 people who completed the survey had heard of social prescribing. Only 8% knew how to access the service.

Over two in five respondents who said they would be happy to use the service in future also said they might not because "I don't feel I know enough about what social prescribers do".

More women than men had heard of social prescribing. Those over 56 years of age said they would be happy to use the services of a social prescriber in future less often than those under 56.

People from a White British ethnic background said they would go to their doctor, instead of a social prescriber, more often than those from other ethnic backgrounds.

When Healthwatch looked at the local GP surgery websites, many did not provide much if any information about social prescribing. Only 34% of the 50 GP websites looked at mentioned the service. Only 26% of these mentioned how to access a social prescriber.

The report contains six recommendations on ways in which GPs can better promote social prescribing.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Bucks
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Key themes
Access to services
Lifestyle and wellbeing; wider determinants of health
Written information, guidance and publicity

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Mystery shopping
Survey
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
General Practice (GP)
Social prescribing

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
259
Age group
50 to 64 years
65 to 79 years
80+ years
Gender
Women
Men
Ethnicity
Arab
Asian / Asian British: Bangladeshi
Asian / Asian British: Chinese
Asian / Asian British: Indian
Asian / Asian British: Pakistani
Asian / Asian British: Any other Asian / Asian British background
Black / Black British: African
Black / Black British: Caribbean
Black / Black British: Any other Black / Black British background
Mixed / Multiple ethnic groups: Asian and White
Mixed / Multiple ethnic groups: Black African and White
Mixed / Multiple ethnic groups: Black Caribbean and White
Mixed / Multiple ethnic groups: Any other Mixed / Multiple ethnic groups background
White: British / English / Northern Irish / Scottish / Welsh
White: Irish
White: Gypsy, Traveller or Irish Traveller
White: Roma
White: Any other White background
Any other ethnic group
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.