Snapshot insight report: barriers to advance care planning

Download (PDF 7.55 MB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Barnet engaged with some local residents via one-to-one interviews to explore their views on Advance Care Planning (ACP) and their experiences of it. They included a broad range of participants, both people who had already experienced ACP and people for whom ACP was a new idea and who did not have any pre-existing health conditions.

The key findings from this piece of work includes:

  • There is a lack of awareness of ACP amongst participants, with many having never heard of ACP before. People consider ACP as clinical jargon and therefore not relevant to the ordinary patient in their journey.
  • Those patients already utilising ACP due to their own lived experience of health issues had a good understanding of ACP.
  • Once participants had ACP explained to them, the majority agreed that in principle they would respond positively to discussing ACP when their GP/clinician first made the approach to discuss it.
  • However, some felt that it may upset their families and that they felt uncomfortable speaking about death. Cultural and religious taboos around the topic of death were also mentioned as being a barrier in discussing and progressing with ACP.
  • Participants acknowledged the time constraints that health professionals, particularly GPs, face in discussing ACP during appointments. They did not wish to use GPs time when they were not acutely unwell.

The report contains recommendations about how to make ACP conversations easier.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Barnet
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Key themes
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Consent, choice, user involvement and being listened to
Public consultation and engagement
Prevention of diseases, including vaccination, screening and public hygiene
Written information, guidance and publicity
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Staffing - levels and training

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
Yes
Primary research method used
Interviews
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
General Practice (GP)
Other

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
19
Age group
All
Gender
All
Sexual orientation
Not known
Does this report feature carers?
Yes
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.