Service user experiences of Croydon University Hospital Accident and Emergency Department

Download (PDF 1.16 MB)

Summary of report content

Between August and November 2019, Healthwatch Croydon asked those who had recently used Croydon University Hospital’s Accident and Emergency department what their experience of services was like. They spoke to 79 service users

The department scored highly for overall satisfaction with over 50% scoring it as excellent and a further 29% stating it was good; friendliness scored highest with 88% scoring excellent or good; 81% waiting areas 64; 70% communication with staff; 69% that what they came for was made better scored excellent or good 54 and 50% were satisfied with waiting times.

Being assessed more than one or speaking to two or more staff was not a concern: Very few patients were assessed once, but no-one found this negative. Most found the experience positive increasing if they had three or more assessments. A significant comment chose not to comment, suggesting that this issue was not a major issue. More had to speak to two or more doctors or nurses, but of those who gave a comment most found this a positive experience, and only very few had a negative experience. Many no comments suggest that this was not a significant issue for many.

Waiting times could be communicated better: When we asked for improvements, many said that they would like to have better communication of waiting times to manage their expectations

Several people found the seats uncomfortable and toilets untidy, as well as limited access to food and drink facilities.

While many found staff friendly and helpful and information good, there were a number of instances were staff did not meet expectations, and information and processes were not as clear as they could be.

Bearing in mind the small sample, for the very young and over 65s the time they had to wait vs expected time was lower, irrespective of how long they wanted to wait. The 19-25 and 26-40 waiting on average up to an hour longer than expected, but these numbers are small. Those aged 41 to 60 were more likely to have higher expectations of less time in A&E than what happened.

The report contains six recommendations.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Croydon
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Key themes
Access to services
Building, Decor and Facilities, including health and safety
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Follow-on treatment and continuity of care
Written information, guidance and publicity
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Service organisation, delivery, change and closure
Staffing - levels and training
Waiting times- punctuality and queuing on arrival

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Survey
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
Emergency department (inc A&E)
Name of service provider
Croydon University Hospital

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
79
Age group
13 to 15 years
16 to 17 years
18 to 24 years
25 to 49 years
65 to 79 years
80+ years
Gender
Women
Men
Sexual orientation
Not known
Does this report feature carers?
Yes
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.