Review of services for people with visual impairment in Havering

Download (PDF 462.6 KB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Havering conducted a thorough review of eye services in response to concerns expressed by residents, professional staff and voluntary organisations about the service model, the facilities, the level of support and the disjointed processes that service users experience. The review found that the number of organisations involved in this chain of care contributed to the inability for care pathways to be described clearly. This may result in residents who are blind or partially sighted being without the physical and health and wellbeing support they require.

Healthwatch Havering conclude that unless there is a more comprehensive understanding of the individual parts of the entire process of care needed in eye services and how they are interconnected, organisations will only be able to address the symptoms of an inadequate service model.

The report makes 18 recommendations to a number of organisations who are involved in the care pathway including the Clinical Commissioning Group, the Barking Havering and Redbridge University Trust, the London Borough of Havering and Moorfields Eye Hospital.

The report makes note of the commitment shown by organisations to address this problem however, there are no responses to the recommendations from these organisations contained within the report.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Havering
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Type of report
Report
Key themes
Access to services
Administration (records, letters, results)
Triage and admissions
Booking appointments
Building, Decor and Facilities, including health and safety
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Consent, choice, user involvement and being listened to
Follow-on treatment and continuity of care
Diagnosis
Remote appointments and digital services
Discharge
Public consultation and engagement
Health inequality
Written information, guidance and publicity
Prevention of diseases, including vaccination, screening and public hygiene
Lifestyle and wellbeing; wider determinants of health
Integration of services and communication between professionals
Medication, prescriptions and dispensing
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Other
Staffing - levels and training
Quality of treatment
Referrals
Service organisation, delivery, change and closure
Waiting times- punctuality and queuing on arrival
Waiting for appointments or treatment; waiting lists for treatment

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Consultation
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
Diagnostic centre/hub
Other
General outpatients and hospital-based consultants
Counselling/Psychotherapy/ Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT)
Ophthalmology
Adult social care, including care packages and social workers
Assisted living/Extra Care housing services/Supported housing

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
5
Age group
Not known
Gender
Not known
Is the gender identity of people in the report the same as the sex they were assigned at birth?
Not known
Sexual orientation
Not known
Pregnancy/maternity
N/A
Types of disabilities
Sensory impairment
Types of long term conditions
Blindness or severe visual impairment
Does this report feature carers?
Yes
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.