MindMate Single Point of Access - Young People's and Parents' views about present experiences and future options

Download (PDF 2.79 MB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Leeds (supported by Common Room) were commissioned by NHS Leeds South and East CCG (lead commissioner of the Future in Mind: Leeds strategy) to engage with young people and parents who had recently been referred via MindMate Single Point of Access (SPA).  They wanted to find out about their experiences of MindMate SPA and their views about possible future developments of the service. They spoke to 14 young people and 7 parents

The majority (81%) of young people and parents supported the idea of a self-referral option into MindMate SPA. Parents and young people said that having different ways to self-refer was important. Being able to complete an online form and make a phone call were the most popular options for young people and parents respectively. Drop-in was also popular amongst young people, with the idea of support available to make a self-referral.

There was mixed feedback of parents’ experiences of MindMate SPA. Some parents spoke positively of their interaction with the SPA team whilst others expressed dissatisfaction at what they felt was an impersonal approach. Some parents mentioned not being clear about what SPA was, not having a contact number, and instances of services not contacting them in the timescales given.

Triple P online is not appropriate for everyone. It requires a level of confidence in IT, self-motivation, headspace, and time and ongoing support from a professional is key to its success. 

The report has seven recommendations about improving referral processes, information and access to support.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Leeds
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Type of report
Report
Key themes
Access to services
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Referrals
Service organisation, delivery, change and closure
Written information, guidance and publicity

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
Yes
Name(s) of the partner organisation(s)
Common Room
Primary research method used
Interviews
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) and Targeted Mental Health in Schools Services (TaMHS)

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
21
Age group
13 to 15 years
16 to 17 years
18 to 24 years
Types of disabilities
Mental health condition
Types of long term conditions
Mental health condition
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.