Mental health how to help

Download (PDF 499.39 KB)

Summary of report content

As the independent champion for users of health and social care services in Surrey, Healthwatch Surrey provide evidence-based insight into the views of local people that use those services. In February and March 2018 their staff and volunteers enabled 70 people to share their views on a wide range of experiences of mental health services; including of mental health hospitals, of community-based services, as carers and as individuals from 19 to 65+ years of age.

The findings informed the people providing mental health services are their best asset. If they fall short, or leave, the ‘system’ (however well-intentioned) cannot easily repair loss of trust and wellbeing. More problems stem from services being unavailable (or simply not known about) than being ineffective. Patients and carers often want to know the full scope of services and help available, rather than simply being told ‘this is what we’ll do’. When people with mental ill-health and their carers are involved in care plans they are substantially more satisfied with services. Around half of people accessing services in the last 18 months have not been involved in their care plan.

The recommendations inform commissioners and service providers should review the way they assess the services they provide to ensure that they incorporate feedback reported directly by patients, on the issues that patients told us were important i.e. that they have: a. been involved in care planning b. been listened to c. been understood as an individual person d. had calls / messages / texts returned e. had consistency of advice f. had continuity of staff g. had swift access to care professionals (when needed) h. had swift access to staff with suitable expertise to offer effective specialist care. In addition, commissioners should consider undertaking research to better understand what good information looks like to different people and carers at different stages of emotional wellbeing. Commissioners should investigate the low level of people reporting involvement in care plans (around half) within this report and further explore the reasons why people do not feel involved.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Surrey
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Type of report
Report
Key themes
Access to services
Administration (records, letters, results)
Written information, guidance and publicity
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Staffing - levels and training
Quality of treatment

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Survey

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) and Targeted Mental Health in Schools Services (TaMHS)
Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) and specialist MH services
Other
Name of service provider
East Surrey Clinical Commissioning Group Guildford and Waverley Clinical Commissioning Group North East Hampshire and Farnham Clinical Commissioning Group North West Surrey Clinical Commissioning Group Surrey Downs Clinical Commissioning Group

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
70
Age group
Not known
Gender
Not known
Is the gender identity of people in the report the same as the sex they were assigned at birth?
Not known
Sexual orientation
Not known
Does this report feature carers?
No
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.