Making Safeguarding Personal Report 2024 - 2025

Download (PDF 2.76 MB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Kingston upon Thames was commissioned by the local authority to undertake a survey of people who had been through the safeguarding process. 49 people took part.

Key findings

59% had received advocacy support (either professional or a personal advocate), but 23% reported that they were not offered an advocate, and some shared that they lacked timely information about their rights. 

71% felt listened to by the person from Kingston Adult Social Care, yet 29% reported feeling unheard and explained that they felt ignored or excluded from decisions about their needs. 

 Nearly half (48%) did not feel involved in creating their safety plan with their social worker, and 32% said their plan did not make sense. 

44% did not discuss potential ongoing risks, which suggests a gap in proactive safeguarding conversations. 

 50% reported improvements in their situation, while 35% saw no change after being through the safeguarding process in Kingston. One person commented that this was due to poor communication or unresolved issues. 

 Many expressed their confusion about care funding rules and thresholds. This isn’t directly a safeguarding issue, but highlights where some people felt frustration.

Post-safeguarding support significantly shaped respondents’ overall experiences, with gaps in continuity of care and support noted. 

Some found their safeguarding meeting venues inappropriate or distressing, underscoring the need for choice and sensitivity.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Kingston upon Thames
Publication date
Key themes
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Consent, choice, user involvement and being listened to
Follow-on treatment and continuity of care
Cost and funding of services
Integration of services and communication between professionals
Patient/resident safety
Service organisation, delivery, change and closure

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Interviews
Survey
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
Adult social care, including care packages and social workers
Other

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
49
Does this report feature carers?
Yes
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.