A local diagnosis: learning the lessons of community diagnostic centres

Download (PDF 377.98 KB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch England wanted to understand people's experiences of using community diagnostic centres.  They commissioned 18 Healthwatch to carry out enter and view visits of local community diagnostic centres.  They spoke to 282 people during the enter and view visits.  Healthwatch England also commissioned polling of 2060 people to understand people's expectations and preferences about diagnostic services.

Almost everyone (93%) felt they had good experiences at Community Diagnostic Centres (CDCs). 

Almost a third of the general public (31%) said getting the tests done quickly was their top priority when choosing where to get a diagnostic test. 

Most people weren’t offered a choice of location (78%) or time (61%) around their appointments – people said they would have liked a choice when the appointment given wasn’t ideal for them. 

Local Healthwatch teams identified accessibility issues at several sites, including: 

failing to meet people’s communication needs. 

barriers for d/Deaf people and people experiencing hearing loss. 

issues with English language interpretation. 

barriers for people with mobility difficulties, Autism, and dementia. 

Visiting the CDC was convenient for most people Healthwatch spoke to – 70% arrived in less than 30 minutes, and 26% arrived in less than an hour. 

People were concerned about issues caused by a lack of information about how to get to the site

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch England
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Key themes
Access to services
Accessibility and reasonable adjustments
Building, Decor and Facilities, including health and safety
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Consent, choice, user involvement and being listened to
Parking and transport
Prevention of diseases, including vaccination, screening and public hygiene
Service organisation, delivery, change and closure
Staffing - levels and training
Waiting times- punctuality and queuing on arrival
Written information, guidance and publicity

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Interviews
Observation (eg Enter and View)
Survey
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
Announced

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
Diagnostic centre/hub

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
2,242
Types of disabilities
Physical or mobility impairment
Sensory impairment
Learning disability or difficulties
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.