LGBTQ+ people’s experience of using health and social care services in North Yorkshire

Download (PDF 2.21 MB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch North Yorkshire undertook research to investigate the health and social care inequalities for people identifying as LGBTQ+. More than 200 people shared their views via a survey and interviews.

Most respondents felt they were open about their LGBTQ+ status when visiting a health or social care professional. Some felt this is integral to their identity, but some feared negative reactions or questioned the relevance of disclosing.

Most felt respected and comfortable using services after disclosing their LGBTQ+ identity and trust staff. But most did not feel services and staff were able to support LGBTQ+ specific needs or gender identity needs.

Most had experienced heteronormative assumptions in health and social care settings, and others had more negative experiences in relation to their LGBTQ+ identity. Accounts of more detailed patient experiences highlighted potential facilitators and barriers to access which apply to staff, services and systems, including use of appropriate language, supportive, friendly, accepting staff and recognition and inclusion of family and partners of choice in care.

There were seven recommendations including collecting LGBTQ+ demographic data, better training, availability and signposting to LGBTQ+ support services, using inclusive language and improving waiting times for gender identity clinics. 

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch North Yorkshire
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Type of report
Report
Key themes
Access to services
Booking appointments
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Health inequality
Lifestyle and wellbeing; wider determinants of health
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Service organisation, delivery, change and closure
Staffing - levels and training
Waiting for appointments or treatment; waiting lists for treatment

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Interviews
Survey
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
General Practice (GP)
Inpatient care/General inpatients
General outpatients and hospital-based consultants
Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) and specialist MH services

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
213
Age group
All
Gender
All
Sexual orientation
Other
Does this report feature carers?
Yes
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.