Inequalities in Milton Keynes

Download (PDF 1.5 MB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Milton Keynes undertook engagement for the Denny review of health inequalities in Bedfordshire.  They engaged with 296 people.

Most people surveyed had engaged with their GP in the last three years.  Nearly two in five had seen a mental health professional.

When asked what went well, people were most likely to mention that health professionals were friendly and approachable and personalised their care.

When asked what didn't go so well, people mentioned having their concerns dismissed and difficulties in getting an appointment. A high number of women expressed their frustration at being patronised or dismissed.  Trans people mentioned similar concerns.  People who had hearing impairments struggled to get their needs met.

When asked what could be better, people wanted to see the following things changed:

  • strict admission or referral criteria causing barriers
  • People not treated with respect and dignity
  • Lack of empathy and compassion

People also wanted to see improved communication, especially for people with communication needs.  People wanted cultural competency training for healthcare professionals.

Nearly all people questioned felt that they looked after their health well or to the best of their ability. Seven in ten felt they had a good level of knowledge about where to get advice about health if they needed to.   People were concerned that a lot of NHS health messages were shared digitally, which were not available to people with sight impairments and those who didn't have any digital access.

The report contains a number of recommendations about information and cultural competency.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Milton Keynes
Publication date
Type of report
Report
Key themes
Access to services
Accessibility and reasonable adjustments
Booking appointments
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Consent, choice, user involvement and being listened to
Health inequality
Integration of services and communication between professionals
Remote appointments and digital services
Service organisation, delivery, change and closure
Written information, guidance and publicity

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Focus group
Survey
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) and specialist MH services
Gender identity clinics/services
General Practice (GP)
Hospital services- not stated

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
296
Gender
Women
Men
Non-binary people
Is the gender identity of people in the report the same as the sex they were assigned at birth?
Yes
No
Ethnicity
Asian / Asian British: Bangladeshi
Asian / Asian British: Chinese
Asian / Asian British: Indian
Asian / Asian British: Pakistani
Asian / Asian British: Any other Asian / Asian British background
Black / Black British: African
Sexual orientation
Asexual
Bisexual
Gay men
Heterosexual / Straight
Lesbians / Gay women
Pansexual
Types of disabilities
Sensory impairment
Learning disability or difficulties
Seldom heard groups
Homeless people
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.