GP Access in Liverpool " a good service when you can get it"

Download (PDF 910.55 KB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Liverpool undertook a survey on people's experiences of GP surgeries.  They heard from 225 people.

A majority of people prefer to contact the GP by phone, followed by going in in-person.

The most popular phone system included a call-back option. People also like to know where they are in the queue.

There were mixed views on eConsult; some people said they had to lie on the form to avoid being advised to go to A&E. Some found it easy to use, others didn’t.

GP websites varied in the information they provided and in how accessible they were, including for speakers of other languages.

Older people were more likely not to use the internet and there were some examples of older people falling through the gaps.

Most patients were unfamiliar with the roles of ARRS staff (Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme e.g. Social Prescribing Link Workers, pharmacists, physiotherapists).

Most patients were unaware of the Enhanced Access scheme which was introduced in October 2022. 

Practice managers said that practices are under enormous pressures, and many struggled to recruit staff to cover higher demand from patients. 

Older people, people with sensory disabilities and speakers of other languages faced additional problems in accessing GPs/primary care.

The report contains 12 recommendations about accessible communications, telephone systems, information to patients, training for staff, publicity about Pharmacy First, better communication about other roles in GP surgeries, information to include on GP websites and how to build websites that work well with a range of browsers and devices.

 

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Liverpool
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Type of report
Enter and View
Key themes
Access to services
Accessibility and reasonable adjustments
Booking appointments
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Remote appointments and digital services
Service organisation, delivery, change and closure
Staffing - levels and training
Triage and admissions
Waiting for appointments or treatment; waiting lists for treatment

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Survey
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
Announced/Unannounced

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
General Practice (GP)

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
225
Age group
50 to 64 years
65 to 79 years
80+ years
Gender
Not known
Is the gender identity of people in the report the same as the sex they were assigned at birth?
Not known
Ethnicity
Arab
Asian / Asian British: Bangladeshi
Asian / Asian British: Chinese
Asian / Asian British: Indian
Asian / Asian British: Pakistani
Asian / Asian British: Any other Asian / Asian British background
Black / Black British: African
White: Any other White background
Sexual orientation
Not known
Does this report feature carers?
No
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.