Experiences of digital and telephone appointments

Download (PDF 420.86 KB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Wandsworth developed an anonymous survey to ask their local people to share their views and experiences on how digital and telephone appointments with GPs and other health and care services has impacted them since the start of the coronavirus pandemic. They also worked to reach a wider community via 1 to 1 interviews and online forums for further insight - this included groups with special educational needs, faith groups and different age groups.

  • They found that views and experiences of using digital and telephone appointments were mixed, even amongst different sections of the community.
  • Some praised and preferred telephone appointments, particularly for routine checks. Common reasons included needing less time to go to the surgery and not having to wait in the waiting room and for those who may have difficulty leaving home.
  • Others fed back negative experiences of digital and telephone appointments. They most often referenced long waiting times to speak to healthcare personnel, unhelpful first points of contact, rushed calls and feeling that they did not provide the same level of care as face-to-face appointments.

Based on their findings, Healthwatch Wandsworth recommend that while digital and telephone appointments can work well for straightforward appointments such as check-ins and repeat prescriptions, they work less well for more complex or sensitive issues or when physical cues or examinations are important.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Wandsworth
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Key themes
Access to services
Booking appointments
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Follow-on treatment and continuity of care
Remote appointments and digital services
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Waiting for appointments or treatment; waiting lists for treatment

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Name(s) of the partner organisation(s)
NHS Wandsworth South West London Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG)
Primary research method used
Survey
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
Pharmacy
General Practice (GP)
NHS 111
General outpatients and hospital-based consultants
Maternity care
Neurology, neurosurgery and stroke care
Physiotherapy
Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) and specialist MH services

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
570
Age group
All
Gender
Not known
Is the gender identity of people in the report the same as the sex they were assigned at birth?
Not known
Sexual orientation
Not known
Does this report feature carers?
Yes
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.