Enter and view: A&E Department, Fairfield General Hospital
Download (PDF 1.34 MB)Summary of report content
Healthwatch Bury undertook enter and view visits to the A&E department at Fairfield General Hospital on 26 November and 1 December 2025. They spoke to 18 people.
The Enter & View visits to Fairfield General Hospital A&E were conducted during periods of high operational pressure but presented contrasting experiences across different areas of the department.
On Wednesday, 26 November:
The department appeared calm and ordered, with visible leadership and amenities supporting both patient and staff experience. Care delivered in bays/cubicles was consistently described as professional, kind, and timely, with clean, private conditions and rapid diagnostics where clinically indicated. Staff interactions were positive, and the environment in clinical spaces met expectations for dignity and safety.
On Monday, 1 December:
Experiences in the main waiting area and corridor spaces were more variable. While some patients reported respectful triage and clear communication, others described long waits (up to 16–17 hours), limited updates, and privacy challenges during transitions. Comfort concerns were noted, including temperature control, seating adequacy, and refreshment access overnight. One patient reported feeling unsafe due to disruptive behaviour in the waiting room, highlighting the need for robust protocols to manage challenging situations.
Across both visits, overall satisfaction remained high for clinical care, but isolated negative experiences, particularly those involving extended pathways and perceived lack of support during prolonged waits, underscore the importance of system-level flow oversight and consistent communication standards.
The visits identified:
Access to GP services as a key driver of A&E attendance, with patients citing difficulty obtaining urgent GP appointments or being redirected by NHS 111.
Operational pressures in acute care leading to corridor use for patient care and variability in patient experience.
Opportunities to keep patients and families informed without them having to ask. Including Regular waiting‑time updates, explaining delays. clear communication about next steps and checking in on people who look worried or confused.
Protecting patients’ dignity and personal information (Speaking quietly when discussing personal details, using private spaces for sensitive conversations, ensuring curtains are fully closed and being mindful of visibility)
Comfort measures such as offering water, blankets, or pillows to those waiting for long periods, providing clear signage, ensuring seating is clean and accessible and checking on vulnerable patients.
Fast triage for urgent symptoms such as chest pain, breathing difficulties, or stroke signs, clear systems for alerting senior clinicians when a patient’s condition changes.
Regular monitoring of high‑risk patients while they wait and ensuring no one deteriorates unnoticed.
The visits demonstrate strong staff commitment and leadership presence but reveal systemic challenges across the urgent care pathway. Addressing primary care access, flow constraints (timely access to an appropriate inpatient bed), and communication gaps will be critical to improving patient experience and safeguarding dignity during peak demand.