Different outcomes, different access to care

Download (PDF 631.77 KB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Bucks, Oxfordshire, Reading, West Berkshire and Wokingham carried out a review of 21 reports published by the five local Healthwatch since 2018 that were relevant to the topic ‘addressing inequalities in health and care access and outcomes’, representing over 1200 people.

The review found that to ensure equality of access, better outcomes, and good experiences of health care and social care for all, services must be personalised to people’s individual needs. Each and every service must be able to communicate effectively and respectfully with everyone who needs to use it. Each and every service must be able to adapt its offer to meet the needs of all service users, so that the service is truly accessible to them - whatever their personal characteristics, including their sex, age, ethnicity, sexual orientation; whether they live with a disability; whether they have chosen to change their gender; their maternity status; their partnership status; and their religion or belief.

A call to action was made including urging all ICS member organisations to listen to patients, service users, families and unpaid carers and to improve care quality as a result.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Bucks
Healthwatch Oxfordshire
Healthwatch Reading
Healthwatch West Berkshire
Healthwatch Wokingham
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Type of report
Report
Key themes
Access to services
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Health inequality
Written information, guidance and publicity
Prevention of diseases, including vaccination, screening and public hygiene
Lifestyle and wellbeing; wider determinants of health
Integration of services and communication between professionals
Staffing - levels and training
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Observation (eg Enter and View)
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
1200
Age group
All
Gender
All
Ethnicity
All
Sexual orientation
Not known
Does this report feature carers?
No
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.