Big Conversation: what does good care look like to local people?

Download (PDF 11.44 MB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Barking and Dagenham, Healthwatch City of London; Healthwatch Hackney; Healthwatch Havering; Healthwatch Redbridge; Healthwatch Tower Hamlets and Healthwatch Waltham Forest undertook a survey and qualitative research with particular groups to come up with a Good Care Framework.  They spoke to 1,578 people.

The Framework has four principles.  Good care is Accessible, Person-Centred, Competent and Trustworthy.

In this framework:

  • Barriers to accessing care are understood and addressed
  • Patients get to make appointments and be seen in a way that works for them
  • Services are inter-connected around the patient
  • Services work well with each other at community level
  • There is continuity of care between services and within services
  • There is consistency of care
  • Patients understand how care decisions are taken and believe that professionals are providing good treatment
  • Appointments for acute issues AND routine check-ups are available within a reasonable timeframe
  • Health and care services both respond to and anticipate people’s needs
  • Patients get reassurance that they are well
  • Health and care services are accountable to patients and local people
  • Patients' worries and concerns are understood and addressed.
  • Cultural differences in expectations of what care should look like are taken into account

The report identifies success indicators for each pillar of the framework and how they can be measured.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Barking And Dagenham
Healthwatch City of London
Healthwatch Hackney
Healthwatch Havering
Healthwatch Redbridge
Healthwatch Newham
Healthwatch Tower Hamlets
Healthwatch Waltham Forest
Publication date
Key themes
Access to services
Accessibility and reasonable adjustments
Booking appointments
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Consent, choice, user involvement and being listened to
Follow-on treatment and continuity of care
Cost and funding of services
Health inequality
Integration of services and communication between professionals
Lifestyle and wellbeing; wider determinants of health
Remote appointments and digital services
Service organisation, delivery, change and closure
Staffing - levels and training
Waiting for appointments or treatment; waiting lists for treatment

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Deliberative event
Engagement event
Focus group
Survey
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
Long Covid clinics or treatment

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
1,578
Age group
16 to 17 years
18 to 24 years
65 to 79 years
80+ years
Gender
Women
Men
Ethnicity
Asian / Asian British: Bangladeshi
Asian / Asian British: Indian
Asian / Asian British: Pakistani
Asian / Asian British: Any other Asian / Asian British background
Black / Black British: African
Black / Black British: Caribbean
Types of disabilities
Sensory impairment
Types of long term conditions
Deafness or severe hearing impairment
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.