15 steps Online review

Download (PDF 4.15 MB)

Summary of report content

Young Healthwatch volunteers at Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire decided to undertake a review of health and social care websites using the 15 steps programme methodology.  They wanted to assess the accessibility of each website for the user; the navigability of the website and find particular information.  They also wanted to find out if the website contained useful advice and information and was well laid out and appealing to all.

They felt that all the websites offering support to young people experiencing mental health issues gave a welcoming experience and were well organised. More importantly they all appeared to be ‘safe’ websites for young people to use. Most websites reviewed appeared to cater well for the cohort of people likely to use them.

They felt that most of the GP and hospital websites they looked at were professional and well laid out with explicit categories and points of information making accessibility easier and less overwhelming for people of all ages. However, there were no welcoming pages or images making visitors feel more comfortable when visiting the site, and as each website was viewed from a young person’s perspective, they realised that there was not a section specifically aimed at young people or an area of the website created solely for that purpose. This could mean that the younger generation may be more hesitant when visiting the website or going to the doctors as it could be less welcoming or comforting.

In contrast, the Covid-19 information was placed very successfully in that it did not alarm people yet did inform them sufficiently about what to do in order to reduce rising cases of Covid-19.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Key themes
Written information, guidance and publicity

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Observation (eg Enter and View)
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
General Practice (GP)
Inpatient care/General inpatients
General outpatients and hospital-based consultants
Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) and Targeted Mental Health in Schools Services (TaMHS)

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
0
Age group
Not known
Gender
Not known
Is the gender identity of people in the report the same as the sex they were assigned at birth?
Not known
Sexual orientation
Not known
Pregnancy/maternity
N/A
Does this report feature carers?
No
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.