Community Mental Health Transformation Evaluation

Download (PDF 788.41 KB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch County Durham undertook an independent evaluation of the Community Mental Health Transformation across County Durham. They spoke to 194 people.

Service users continue to face significant barriers to access, including long waiting times, fragmented pathways, poor communication, and lack of continuity. Individuals with moderate-to-high needs are most affected, often falling between primary and secondary care thresholds. 

While awareness of services has improved slightly, fewer people report having all their needs met, and confidence in choice, control, and coordination has declined. Service providers identify capacity constraints, workforce pressures, and inconsistent referral criteria as key contributors to these challenges. 

Providers report improvements in communication and multi-disciplinary team working, supported by huddles, steering groups, and the Gateway.  However, inconsistent engagement, outdated IT systems, VCSE exclusion, and staff turnover continue to undermine coordination. 

Both service users and providers report repeated storytelling, weak feedback loops, and referrals being rejected rather than jointly resolved. 

Staff generally take a flexible, person-centred approach, but confidence in stepping up/down is mixed. Huddles are valued for networking but are unreliable as a referral mechanism due to poor attendance and follow-through. 

The Gateway shows early promise as a single point of access, but awareness and uptake remain limited. A system gap for people with moderate-to-high needs is driving delays, inappropriate referrals, and unmet need. 

Positive changes include improved relationships and collaboration between statutory and VCSE partners and greater awareness of local services and referral criteria.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch County Durham
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Key themes
Access to services
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Consent, choice, user involvement and being listened to
Follow-on treatment and continuity of care
Integration of services and communication between professionals
Quality of treatment
Referrals
Staffing - levels and training
Waiting for appointments or treatment; waiting lists for treatment

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Survey
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) and specialist MH services

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
194
Age group
18 to 24 years
25 to 49 years
50 to 64 years
65 to 79 years
80+ years
Gender
Women
Men
Prefer to self-describe
Prefer not to say
Is the gender identity of people in the report the same as the sex they were assigned at birth?
Yes
No
Prefer not to say
Sexual orientation
Bisexual
Gay men
Heterosexual / Straight
Lesbians / Gay women
Types of long term conditions
Mental health condition
Seldom heard groups
People who are geographically isolated
People on low incomes
People with limited family or social networks
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.