Evaluating translating and interpreting services across BLMK

Download (PDF 508.52 KB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Bedford Borough, Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire, Healthwatch Luton and Healthwatch Milton Keynes agreed to map and review translation and interpretation services as part of the Denny Review.  They visited local opticians, dentists, pharmacies, GP practices, hospitals and community services, speaking to at least 65 staff.

One of the most critical observations is the widespread reliance on informal, ad-hoc methods for communication—such as Google Translate, family members, and bilingual staff—rather than using commissioned interpreter services. Across settings, there was a marked lack of awareness among staff regarding available translation services like DA Languages or Language Line, with many reporting little to no training in their use. This gap not only undermines the quality and safety of care but also raises concerns about compliance with safeguarding and data protection regulations.

Furthermore, the report highlights an absence of clear, publicly visible information and signage in multiple languages. This deficit leaves both patients and healthcare professionals uninformed about patients’ rights to access professional interpretation and translation services. In dental and optician practices, this results in routine reliance on informal methods, while in GP practices, despite relatively higher awareness, inconsistent practices prevail. The inconsistency is even more pronounced within hospital environments, where different wards within the same Trust follow varied procedures, leading to confusion and, at times, delays in service delivery. 

Feedback from BSL interpreters further underscores systemic issues: many expressed a preference for direct contracting with service providers to circumvent the administrative inefficiencies associated with current agency-led models. Current challenges in booking interpreters increases reliance on family members—actions that compromise both the quality of care and patient privacy. The evidence clearly supports the need for a coordinated, system-wide response. Implementation of the following recommendations will improve patient outcomes, ensure regulatory compliance, and support equitable healthcare delivery across BLMK.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Bedford Borough
Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire
Healthwatch Luton
Healthwatch Milton Keynes
Publication date
Key themes
Accessibility and reasonable adjustments
Administration (records, letters, results)
Health inequality
Written information, guidance and publicity

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Engagement event
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
Cardiology/heart medicine
Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) and specialist MH services
Counselling/Psychotherapy/ Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT)
Dentist
Ear, nose and throat, audiology and maxillofacial services
Eating Disorder Clinics and Services
Emergency department (inc A&E)
General Practice (GP)
Hospital services- not stated
Maternity care
Ophthalmology
Optometry services/opticians
Other
Pharmacy
Sexual health

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
65
Types of long term conditions
Deafness or severe hearing impairment
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.