Recorded messages and automated telephony in GP surgeries

Download (PDF 207.44 KB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Greenwich wanted to review the information on recorded messages and automated telephony systems at GP surgeries, as a result of experiences reported to them during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Their audit found the quality of information provided to service users in recorded messages and telephony menu options varied between GP surgeries with little standardisation. They found examples of good practice, with welcoming and informative recorded messages and good descriptions of services offered and how to access them. Others were long and included information that was less useful for patients.

Only half of surgeries provided callers with information about the number of people ahead of them in the queue.  Just over half told callers about using online triage systems and less than a third provided telephone menu options to book appointments.

Only one in six surgeries provided information for callers who were digitally excluded or needed interpretation services.

Just over a third offered a menu option for test results, with nearly half giving a specific time to call back.

While many recorded messages told callers that repeat prescriptions could not be requested over the telephone, very few informed callers how to request repeat prescriptions.

The report contains 6 recommendations.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Greenwich
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Key themes
Access to services
Administration (records, letters, results)
Booking appointments
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Remote appointments and digital services
Written information, guidance and publicity
Accessibility and reasonable adjustments
Service organisation, delivery, change and closure
Waiting times- punctuality and queuing on arrival

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Observation (eg Enter and View)
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
General Practice (GP)

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
0
Age group
Not known
Gender
Not known
Is the gender identity of people in the report the same as the sex they were assigned at birth?
Not known
Sexual orientation
Not known
Does this report feature carers?
Not known
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.