Accessing your GP remotely

Download (PDF 15.49 MB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Barnet gathered feedback from local people to find out about their experience of accessing their GP remotely. They carried out an anonymous online survey, 1-2-1 telephone interviews and community focus groups to capture insight from people who are both online and offline.  Their findings revealed:

  • People liked certain aspects of the new GP process – this includes the ease of using the online booking system, quick turnaround time from requesting an appointment and seeing the GP, and ability to collect prescriptions.
  • Some people expressed that they felt safer having a remote appointment with their GP compared to attending in person due to the risk of catching COVID-19.
  • People felt that remote appointments were more convenient, quick and time-efficient for many reasons, such as not travelling to the surgery, ability to book an appointment at any time of the day etc.
  • However, people didn’t like certain aspects of the new process as well – this includes lengthy online forms with irrelevant questions, longer waiting time to get routine appointments and system inefficiencies resulting in increased access to more acute pathways.
  • People had concerns about patient choice, their privacy and data security, the accuracy of “digital diagnosis” and gaps in communication, meeting people’s accessibility needs, difficulties for people who are digitally excluded and frustrations about lack of face-to-face access.

The report has several recommendations for the providers and contains a response from the North Central London Clinical Commissioning Group.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Barnet
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Key themes
Access to services
Booking appointments
Cleanliness, Hygiene and Infection Control
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Diagnosis
Remote appointments and digital services
Written information, guidance and publicity

Methodology and approach

Name(s) of the partner organisation(s)
Multiple partners
Primary research method used
Focus group
Interviews
Survey
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
General Practice (GP)
Name of service provider
North Central London Clinical Commissioning Group

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
376
Age group
All
Gender
All
Sexual orientation
Not known
Does this report feature carers?
Yes
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.