Cut loose - An investigation into the effect of deregistration of homeless people from GP Practices

Download (PDF 905.47 KB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Manchester launched a survey aimed at providing a voice for those homeless people who had been deregistered from a GP practice, as homelessness is increasing in Greater Manchester. 

Two in five respondents stated that they used a walk-in centre or an A&E department as a stopgap measure to deal with their existing health conditions. One respondent, who was suffering from mental health issues, reported as being deregistered twice from GP practices because they lived at 5 different addresses in Manchester within 6 months. During this period, they were sent to a walk-in centre on several occasions.

Two in five homeless people did not know where to go for help with registering with another GP practice once they had been deregistered. Some also reported that they did not receive any notice of their deregistration.

There is also a lack of a clear and understood process that GP practices must go through in order to deregister a patient. One respondent reported that, despite their experience having happened a few years ago, it took them by “surprise” to learn that they could even offer feedback. Several respondents were unhappy about the reasons given to justify their deregistration and were clearly frustrated by the process, particularly by the lack of notice. Ensuring that the deregistration process is clear, fair and transparent should be viewed as an important concern to address.

The report includes seven recommendations about deregistration and access to healthcare for homeless people.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Manchester
Publication date
Key themes
Access to services
Administration (records, letters, results)
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Health inequality
Service organisation, delivery, change and closure
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Staffing - levels and training

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Survey
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
General Practice (GP)
Emergency department (inc A&E)
Urgent primary care, including Urgent Treatment Centres, walk-in care, out of hours GP services, minor injury and treatment centres

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
0
Age group
Not known
Gender
Not known
Is the gender identity of people in the report the same as the sex they were assigned at birth?
Not known
Sexual orientation
Not known
Does this report feature carers?
No
Seldom heard groups
Homeless people
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.