GP quality in Coventry: what is important to local people and recommendations for action

Download (PDF 717.58 KB)

Summary of report content

GP services are frequently the subject of national policy initiatives because of their central function in the health system. It is important to Healthwatch that the views of local people are a driver in future development of local GP services

Our aims in undertaking this work were:

  • To support the work of the Local Health and Wellbeing Board task group on primary care
  • To enable the views of local people to influence the way forward
  • To help define a bench mark for good quality GP services in the City

We asked  local people what is important to them when they are using GP services via their GP practice or the Coventry Walk in Centre. We ran two qualitative surveys and four focus groups. Meetings were also held with a sample of GP practice managers and visits made to local the Walk in Centre.  We gathered the views of 277 people.

Our work identified some trends in what people wanted and detail about what people thought made a good quality GP service/experience.

We made 8 recommendations about customer focused training for reception staff; written information; clarifying to the public the role of the Walk In Centre; connecting IT systems; developing patient engagement; and promoting complaints advocacy via GP practices.

Healthwatch presented this report to the multi-agency Primary Care Task Group on 27 November 2014 and further discussion was held at the group’s meeting on 22 January 2015. 

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Coventry
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Type of report
Report
Key themes
Access to services
Booking appointments
Complaints
Public consultation and engagement
Written information, guidance and publicity
Integration of services and communication between professionals
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Staffing - levels and training

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Engagement event
Focus group
Survey
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
General Practice (GP)
Urgent primary care, including Urgent Treatment Centres, walk-in care, out of hours GP services, minor injury and treatment centres

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
277
Age group
All
Gender
All
Sexual orientation
Not known
Does this report feature carers?
Yes
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.