Views of parents of children with Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) about the use of technology in the NHS

Download (PDF 1.2 MB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Coventry undertook research into people’s views of digitalisation of health care following their research for the Long Term Plan. This report concerns the findings of a focus group of parents of children/young people with Special Educational Needs (SEND).

Eight people participated the focus group on Tuesday 28 January 2020. They were women with sons and daughters who were children or young adults and who had a wide range of experience of local NHS and social care services.

The participants identified the services that communicate best which were GP, ophthalmologist, educational psychologist, audiologist, and community paediatrician and speech and language specialists. The services which participants had a mix of experiences included Occupational Therapy, educational psychologist, and physio.

Participants had a wide range of concerns about the use of technology in health services, including security, access, accuracy of records, the value of face to face and poor health care IT systems that didn’t speak to each other.  They also felt that the use of technology had a wide range of benefits, including that people who don’t want to leave the house can access health services, the use of video links for multi-disciplinary meetings and providing information about waiting times.

Participants agreed a list of guiding principles for the use of technology in healthcare.  These included: opting in rather than digital by default, flexibility, choice of communication method, choice over the security processes used, alerts when the information changes, right to change incorrect information and a clear recognition of who is managing a patient’s care.

Participants mentioned having had many appointments which could have been delivered by technology and how appointments could be delivered in a different way.

Overall the group was positive about the use of technology and the experiences and comments they have can be used to help identify how to go about this.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Coventry
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Type of report
Report
Key themes
Access to services
Administration (records, letters, results)
Booking appointments
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Remote appointments and digital services
Written information, guidance and publicity
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Waiting for appointments or treatment; waiting lists for treatment

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Focus group
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
Dentist
General Practice (GP)
Cardiology/heart medicine
Ear, nose and throat, audiology and maxillofacial services
Gastroenterology: digestive, intestinal, and bowel services
Neurology, neurosurgery and stroke care
Speech and language therapy; occupational therapy; other allied health professions
Paediatric care
Physiotherapy
Hospital-based psychiatric care
Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) and Targeted Mental Health in Schools Services (TaMHS)
Eating Disorder Clinics and Services
Other
Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) and specialist MH services
Emergency department (inc A&E)
Equipment services (including wheelchairs, incontinence, home adaptations)

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
8
Age group
Not known
Gender
Women
Sexual orientation
Not known
Pregnancy/maternity
N/A
Types of disabilities
Learning disability or difficulties
Mental health condition
Types of long term conditions
Learning disability
Does this report feature carers?
Yes
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.