We are what we eat: transforming food aid in Westminster

Download (PDF 609.49 KB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Westminster and Healthwatch Kensington and Chelsea undertook a project to review food resources and food aid offered within the two boroughs. They wanted to examine the reach and effectiveness of the existing food aid provision strategy, with the overall aims to increase diversity, equity, and sustainability in food aid, promote nutrition and healthy eating, and eliminate food insecurity. Considering residents tend to be from diverse communities, this project additionally aimed to understand the extent to which the foods offered met residents’ social and cultural needs.  They undertook a survey and engagement events and gathered feedback from 57 people.

The key demographics using the service were people aged 50-79, facing long-term health conditions, and facing high financial insecurity from white or other backgrounds. Residents using the food aid services generally reported that they were appreciative of the support with the food provided, especially in times of vulnerability and financial insecurity. There was also positive feedback from the service providers on the diversity, sustainability, as well as the promotion of healthy eating of food resources. However, there were a considerable number of residents who felt the food resources should meet cultural, dietary, and healthy needs of the community they serve.

Most of the feedback referring to the attitude of staff was also positive, though there were a considerable number of concerns regarding quality and cost of funding of the service.

The report contains six recommendations about food diversity, funding, collaboration, service monitoring, further research and tackling food poverty.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Kensington and Chelsea
Healthwatch Westminster
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Key themes
Food, nutrition and catering
Health inequality
Lifestyle and wellbeing; wider determinants of health

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Focus group
Survey
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
Services other than health or social care

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
57
Seldom heard groups
People on low incomes
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.