Patient Experience of Electronic Prescription Service in North Somerset

Download (PDF 826.02 KB)

Summary of report content

In 2016, Healthwatch North Somerset completed an evaluation of Electronic Prescription

Service (EPS). It was recognised that prescription services, and in particular the Electronic Prescription

Service adopted by GPs, was mentioned several times in the period between April and June 2016 and on that basis it was recommended that more feedback was collected on this specific topic to gauge public understanding of the system.

A total of 27 responses (14 negative and 13 positive) survey responses are attributed directly to the Electronic Prescription Service.

The aim was to summarise the feedback received by local people with regard to the EPS system, to identify any lack of understanding and to provide clarification of the system.

The findings include these below:

• Clear information would enable patients to decide if they would benefit from using the Electronic Prescription Service.

• Clear information would enable patients to make informed choices about the management of their prescriptions and medications.

• The service may especially benefit the older populations of the county if they live in rural areas.

Healthwatch North Somerset recommends the following based on the feedback received by the public.

• Recommend raising awareness of the public on the Electronic Prescription Service including prominent publicity in GP surgeries and pharmacies to dispel the myths surrounding the system and aid greater understanding.

At the time of being published the report contained no response to the finding shared with the Local Pharmaceutical Committee, North Somerset Council, North Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group and North Somerset Community Partnership (NSCP).

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch North Somerset
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Type of report
Patient experience
Service Evaluation
Key themes
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Remote appointments and digital services
Quality of treatment

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Engagement event
Survey
Interviews
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
Pharmacy
Name of service provider
Electronic Prescription Service EPS.

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
42
Age group
Not known
Gender
Not known
Is the gender identity of people in the report the same as the sex they were assigned at birth?
Not known
Sexual orientation
Not known
Does this report feature carers?
No
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.