Asylum seekers and refugee engagement

Download (PDF 2.29 MB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Blackburn and Darwen examined asylum seeker and refugee’s experiences of using local services and the additional support available to them. The team engaged with service users at the Asylum Seeker and Refugee Drop-in Sessions over two months. Using informal interviews and focus groups, 60 people shared their views and experiences.

The feedback revealed that communication was a recurring them. Respondents suggested that there could be better explanation of diagnosis and ensuring that they understand the potential implications from taking medication. Language interpreting often fell to the patient’s children during appointments. In addition, the respondents reported that they would like to have more flexibility of appointments; to have more options with booking GP appointments and more time for children’s appointments. Respondents felt they were not taken seriously by health professionals and that the attitudes of staff could be improved by them introducing themselves to patients and create an environment where patients are comfortable to discuss their mental health.

The report made a number of recommendations including complying with guidance to ensure that patients understand the care they require, ensure that GP patients have access to a formal language interpreter and allow patients to make appointments in different ways via telephone or in person. The report also suggested that local services should review their Equality and Diversity training.

No service provider response was included in the report.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Blackburn with Darwen
Publication date
Type of report
Report
Key themes
Booking appointments
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Diagnosis
Health inequality
Written information, guidance and publicity
Accessibility and reasonable adjustments
Medication, prescriptions and dispensing
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Engagement event
Focus group
Interviews

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
General Practice (GP)
Name of service provider
Primary Care Services

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
60
Age group
Not known
Gender
Not known
Is the gender identity of people in the report the same as the sex they were assigned at birth?
Not known
Sexual orientation
Not known
Does this report feature carers?
Not known
Seldom heard groups
Refugees or asylum seekers
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.