Follow up to GP patient experience report

Download (PDF 153.04 KB)

Summary of report content

In October 2016, 10 Healthwatch Bucks volunteers visited 47 individual GP surgery waiting rooms; viewed 55 GP surgery/practice websites and called 61 GP surgery/practice when they knew they were closed to hear their out of hours message. The aim of this project was to find good practice and identify opportunities for low cost improvements to the patient experience. The findings were published in a report, in February 2017, on non-clinical patient experience.

When the summary report was published, Healthwatch Bucks wrote to each GP surgery/practice with a full breakdown of the findings and provided a “Good Practice Checklist” for surgeries/practices (included in the report). They asked each surgery/practice to inform them of any actions they would be taking to improve their information. This report summarises the responses received from 26 practices.

- 15 said that they had made changes or planned to take action as a result of the findings.

- 12 noted that they would be using the good practice guide provided by HW.

- 12 said that they had involved or would be discussing the results with their Patient Participation Groups (PPGs).

- 6 disagreed with elements of the findings or the approach used.

- 15/26 practices gave more details of the changes they had made. Some of these were: Improving the telephone answering messages and increasing the amount of information available on website, making information clearer, having a new website and improving the waiting room and telephone systems. Other actions taken were also listed in the report.

Healthwatch Bucks further recommends that all practices continue to use the “Good Practice Guide” and to work with their PPGs to help identify what patients would find most helpful and convenient and where improvements can be made to the patient experience.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Bucks
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Type of report
Report
Key themes
Booking appointments
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Written information, guidance and publicity

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Observation (eg Enter and View)
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
General Practice (GP)
Urgent primary care, including Urgent Treatment Centres, walk-in care, out of hours GP services, minor injury and treatment centres

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
0
Age group
All
Gender
All
Ethnicity
All
Sexual orientation
Not known
Does this report feature carers?
No
Seldom heard groups
People on low incomes
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.