An evaluation of the urgent care centre at New Cross Hospital

Download (PDF 758.92 KB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Wolverhampton wanted to evaluate the new urgent care centre (UCC) which came into being on 1st April 2016.They approached the Wolverhampton Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) with a research proposal to review the patient experience of users of the UCC. The research method chosen was a face to-face survey to focus on the quality of service delivery and meeting the needs of patients. The results would provide evidence for one of the Key Performance Indicators in the UCC service specification, requiring the provider to conduct patient surveys.

The main findings were:

• 63% were referred to the UCC by another service and over half of these were from the NHS 111 service.

• 78% provided GP-related reasons for attending the UCC, including those who couldn’t get an appointment or whose GPs were closed.

• 85% said that it was easy or very easy to find the UCC. Signposting was the most common recommendation for improvement.

• 88-93% rated the friendliness, helpfulness and understanding of staff as good or very good. However, 34% rated waiting time as poor or very poor.

• 90-93% rated lighting, cleanliness and availability of seating as good or very good.

• 73% were waiting two hours or less to be seen.

• 56% said that the clinician gave their name and 41% explained their job role.

• 83-95% agreed or strongly agreed that, during their consultation, they had time to explain their problem, had a clear explanation of their diagnosis and were told what would happen next. However, 68-71% disagreed or strongly disagreed that they were given printed information about their diagnosis and treatment.

• 79% said that information was not available or they were unsure about how they could make a comment, compliment or complaint..

• 81% were satisfied or very satisfied overall with the service at UCC.

12 recommendations were made. It does not include a response from the service provider.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Wolverhampton
Publication date
Date evidence capture began
Date evidence capture finished
Type of report
Service Evaluation
Key themes
Access to services
Administration (records, letters, results)
Triage and admissions
Building, Decor and Facilities, including health and safety
Parking and transport
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Complaints
Diagnosis
Food, nutrition and catering
Written information, guidance and publicity
Medication, prescriptions and dispensing
Public consultation and engagement
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Staffing - levels and training
Quality of treatment
Service organisation, delivery, change and closure
Waiting times- punctuality and queuing on arrival

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
Not known
Name(s) of the partner organisation(s)
Wolverhampton Clinical Commissioning Group
Primary research method used
Survey
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
Urgent primary care, including Urgent Treatment Centres, walk-in care, out of hours GP services, minor injury and treatment centres

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
187
Age group
All
Gender
All
Sexual orientation
Not known
Does this report feature carers?
Yes
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.