Your experiences of screening

Download (PDF 1.2 MB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Birmingham and Solihull spoke to 5 people about their experiences of screening. While this is a small group, their in-depth stories provide valuable insight into what helps and what gets in the way when people try to access screening. These experiences show both the strengths of current services and the points where people may encounter difficulties within the system.

People shared a mix of positive and negative experiences. Several themes came through clearly: Changes to venues for screening can cause significant anxiety for patients. A change of location can make the whole process harder, especially for individuals with visual or mobility impairments.

Accessibility needs may not always be carefully considered for screening.

Stigma and assumptions can make it harder for some to be taken seriously. Past addiction or mental health history can sometimes shape how concerns are responded to.

Timely follow-up was described as reassuring and sometimes lifesaving.

Communication can have a strong impact on people’s emotional experience. Clear letters, explanations and personal contact help people feel safe. Rushed or unclear conversations can make people feel unsure or forgotten.

These issues can influence whether someone can comfortably attend screening appointments, feels able to return or chooses to avoid the process completely. They therefore need to be considered to ensure comfortable and accessible screening for those who need it.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Local Healthwatch
Healthwatch Birmingham and Solihull
Publication date
Key themes
Access to services
Accessibility and reasonable adjustments
Caring, kindness, respect and dignity
Communication with patients; treatment explanation; verbal advice
Consent, choice, user involvement and being listened to
Health inequality
Prevention of diseases, including vaccination, screening and public hygiene
Service organisation, delivery, change and closure
Staffing - levels and training
Written information, guidance and publicity

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken in partnership with another organisation?
No
Primary research method used
Interviews
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Details of health and care services included in the report
Screening services and testing

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views
5
Types of long term conditions
Blindness or severe visual impairment
Seldom heard groups
People with or recovering from addictions
Did you find this attached report useful?
0
No votes have been submitted yet.